Cross-Chain Swaps, Bridges, and DEXs Explained
AI summary
The article explains the importance of cross-chain swaps, which enable the exchange of digital assets across different blockchain networks and are essential for interoperability in the expanding blockchain ecosystem. It compares centralized exchanges (CEXs), which offer convenience but carry custodial and privacy risks, with decentralized exchanges (DEXs), which provide greater transparency and user control. The article also discusses the technical challenges and common reasons for cross-chain swap failures, such as bridge complexities, liquidity issues, and transaction errors, as well as how refunds are handled when swaps fail.
Individual blockchains are isolated digital ecosystems that connect all applications within a single network. For instance, all tokens on Ethereum can be swapped easily through decentralized exchanges because they share a common infrastructure. However, with the rapid growth of blockchain networks, a lack of connectivity between them has created a need for cross-chain infrastructure—tools that enable interoperability between different blockchains. Without such infrastructure, blockchains remain as disconnected as standalone apps in today’s Web2 environment. Cross-chain swaps solve this problem by allowing seamless exchange of digital assets across multiple blockchains. Cross-chain swaps are becoming essential for an interconnected blockchain ecosystem, like decentralized exchanges for single networks.
About Cross-Chain Swaps
Cross-chain swaps on centralized exchanges (CEXs) allow users to trade cryptocurrencies on a single platform from different blockchains. The exchange controls users’ funds, manages transactions, and provides liquidity.
While convenient, this setup carries significant custodial and operational risks. Users must trust the exchange to safeguard their assets, but they risk losing those assets if hackers compromise the exchange, it becomes insolvent, or it engages in fraud. Additionally, regulatory oversight can restrict access or freeze funds depending on the jurisdiction. Technical issues, such as system outages or delays, may also interrupt trading, especially during high-demand periods.
CEXs often require KYC verification, compromising user privacy by storing personal data that a breach could expose. Users must weigh these risks against centralized exchanges' liquidity and ease of use.
Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs)
Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) are peer-to-peer marketplaces where crypto users trade directly without relinquishing control of their assets. Transactions are executed automatically through smart contracts, which act as self-enforcing agreements written into code.
Unlike CEXs, DEXs remove intermediaries, allowing for greater transparency and self-custody of funds. Learn more about DEXs here.
Cross-Chain DEXs
A cross-chain DEX extends this concept by enabling the exchange of assets across multiple blockchain networks. These platforms use cross-chain bridges and interoperability protocols.
How Cross-Chain Bridges Work
Cross-chain bridges are protocols that allow tokens and data to flow between blockchains. They typically function by:
- Locking assets on one blockchain and minting equivalent tokens on another, or
- Burning tokens on the source chain and minting new ones on the destination chain.
For example, a bridge can lock Ethereum (ETH) on the Ethereum blockchain and mint Wrapped Ethereum (WETH) on Binance Smart Chain (BSC), making it usable within the BSC ecosystem.
These bridges are the backbone of cross-chain swaps, enabling the movement of assets without centralized intermediaries. Cross-chain DEXs build on this functionality to let users trade assets directly from different blockchains in a unified environment.
The Issue with Cross-Chain Bridges
Cross-chain communication introduces trust and flexibility trade-offs that don’t exist within a single blockchain. Interactions across chains require additional assumptions and security models, making them inherently more complex.
Wrapped vs. Native Assets
Wrapped assets mirror tokens from another blockchain but depend on entities or protocols to securely hold the underlying tokens, introducing extra risk layers.
Finality
Finality ensures that a transaction is considered final once confirmed on the source chain. If the source chain rolls back a transaction, it could invalidate tokens minted on the destination chain, causing discrepancies or losses. These technical and trust challenges are at the heart of most cross-chain bridge failures.
Common Reasons for Cross-Chain Swap Failures
Cross-chain swaps can fail for several reasons. Failures generally fall into three categories:
- Failed source-chain swaps
- Failed destination-chain swaps
- Failed cross-bridge transactions
Common Causes
- Broadcast failure: The system didn’t properly transmit the transaction to the blockchain network.
- Insufficient gas: The system didn’t allocate enough funds to cover transaction fees.
- Insufficient approved crypto amount: The user didn’t authorize or provide enough tokens.
- Smart contract execution error: Issues in the DEX or bridge’s smart contract, often due to bugs or logic errors.
- Transaction sped up or canceled: Changing gas settings or canceling the transaction mid-process can disrupt execution.
- Risky tokens (SafeMoon or honeypot types): Some tokens have restrictive or malicious code preventing withdrawals.
- Triggered blocklist: The bridge may reject transactions involving blacklisted tokens or addresses.
- Amount outside limits: The swap amount is below the minimum or above the maximum the bridge allows.
- Insufficient liquidity: The bridge doesn’t have enough assets in its liquidity pool to fulfill the swap.
- Timeouts: Delays or congestion cause the transaction to exceed the processing window.
Cross-Chain Refunds
If a cross-chain swap fails, the user can receive a refund, depending on where the failure occurred.
If the problem occurs during a source-chain swap or cross-bridge transaction, the user typically receives their original tokens back, often without any deduction for transaction fees.
If the destination-chain swap fails, the user receives the intermediate token used in the bridge (USDT, USDC, DAI, WETH, or ETH).
FAQ – Cross-chain Swaps
What is the difference between an on-chain swap and a cross-chain swap?
An on-chain swap converts cryptocurrencies within the same blockchain. A cross-chain swap converts assets between blockchains—sending a token on one network and receiving another on another.
Why do swaps fail?
Network congestion can spike gas fees, causing low-fee transactions to fail. Insufficient liquidity or extreme market volatility can also halt swaps to prevent slippage losses. Additionally, initiating multiple identical transactions with insufficient balance will cause all but the first to fail.
Do I still need to pay network fees after a transaction fails?
Yes. Network fees compensate miners or validators for processing the transaction, regardless of whether it succeeds.
Tangem AG provides only hardware wallets and non-custodial software solutions for managing digital assets. Tangem is not regulated as a financial services provider or cryptocurrency exchange. Tangem does not hold, custody, or control users’ assets or transactions. Crypto transaction services are provided by third-party providers. Tangem provides no advice or recommendation on the use of these third-party services.
Staking and yield generation services are provided by third-party blockchain protocols and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. Tangem provides non-custodial access only. Earnings from staking are not guaranteed, may fluctuate significantly, and depend entirely on network or protocol conditions. Users participate at their own risk.
